Sprayed Weed Killers?

Get the Justice You Deserve!

Schedule your free consultation today and discover how we can help you recover the compensation you’re entitled to.

Roundup Lawsuit

Thousands of individuals have filed claims that exposure to Roundup weed killer caused them to develop serious illnesses, including non-Hodgkin lymphoma and certain types of Leukemia. The Roundup lawsuit has become one of the largest and most closely watched product liability litigations in the United States. Plaintiffs claim that the manufacturers failed to adequately warn consumers about the potential health risks associated with long-term exposure to glyphosate, the primary active ingredient in Roundup products.

For decades, Roundup was widely used by homeowners, farmers, landscapers, agricultural workers, groundskeepers, and municipalities. It became one of the most commonly used herbicides in the world because of its effectiveness in controlling weeds. However, scientific studies, regulatory reviews, and high-profile jury verdicts have led to growing public concern regarding the product’s safety.

Our free consultation will explain the Roundup litigation, what you should know if you were diagnosed due to Roundup exposure, and if you are eligible for compensation.

During your free consultation, we will:

Lawsuit Status

Testimonials

copyright @2026

Get the Justice You Deserve!

Additional Insight on the Roundup Lawsuit

Notable Roundup Settlements

What began as a few lawsuits against Monsanto eventually became one of the largest mass tort cases in U.S. history after Bayer acquired Monsanto in 2018.

Plaintiffs across the country claimed that years of exposure to the weedkiller Roundup caused non-Hodgkin lymphoma and Leukemia, and that the company failed to warn users about potential cancer risks. 

The first major shock came in 2018, when a California jury awarded groundskeeper Dewayne Johnson $289 million after concluding that Roundup contributed to his cancer. Soon after came additional blockbuster verdicts:

• $80 million in the Hardeman federal trial
• More than $2 billion awarded to the Pilliod couple
• A $2.25 billion verdict in the McKivison case
• A $2.065 billion Georgia verdict in Barnes v. Monsanto

Why Are People Filing Roundup Lawsuits?

Individuals who filed Roundup lawsuits generally allege that repeated exposure to glyphosate-based herbicides caused them to develop non-Hodgkin lymphoma or related cancers. Plaintiffs claim the manufacturer knew or should have known about potential cancer risks but failed to provide adequate warnings to consumers.

Common allegations include:

• Failure to warn users about cancer risks
• Negligent product design
• Misrepresentation of product safety
• Inadequate testing
• Defective marketing practices

Many plaintiffs state they used Roundup regularly for years before being diagnosed with cancer.

Understanding Glyphosate

Glyphosate is the active ingredient found in Roundup, and is a chemical herbicide used to control broadleaf weeds and grasses. It became extremely popular because it effectively kills weeds while allowing certain genetically engineered crops to survive treatment.

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma/Leukemia and Roundup Exposure

Most Roundup claims involve allegations related to non-Hodgkin lymphoma and Leukemia, a type of cancer affecting the lymphatic system.

The lymphatic system is part of the immune system and includes:

• Lymph nodes
• Spleen
• Bone marrow
• Lymphatic vessels

Cancer in the lymphatic system can interfere with the body’s ability to fight infection and disease.

Common Symptoms of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma and Leukemia

Symptoms may include:

• Swollen lymph nodes
• Fatigue
• Night sweats
• Fever
• Unexplained weight loss
• Persistent infections
• Chest pain
• Abdominal discomfort
• Shortness of breath

Individuals experiencing symptoms should seek medical attention from qualified healthcare providers.

Who May Qualify for a Roundup Lawsuit?

People who may qualify for significant compensation are those who:

• Used Roundup regularly as a homeowner over extended periods
• Worked in agriculture or landscaping
• Applied glyphosate products occupationally
• Were diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphoma or Leukemia

Occupations commonly associated with exposure include:

• Farmers
• Groundskeepers
• Landscapers
• Agricultural workers
• Nursery employees
• Municipal maintenance workers
• Golf course maintenance staff

Homeowners who used Roundup should also explore their legal options.

Roundup Jury Verdicts

Several large jury verdicts have drawn national attention to the litigation. Plaintiffs in these cases alleged that prolonged exposure to Roundup contributed to their cancer diagnoses.

Some verdicts awarded substantial compensation for:

• Medical expenses
• Pain and suffering
• Emotional distress
• Lost wages
• Punitive damages

Punitive damages are intended to punish especially harmful conduct and discourage similar behavior in the future.

How Roundup Lawsuits Work

Roundup lawsuits are generally handled as mass tort litigation rather than traditional class actions.

In a mass tort:

• Each plaintiff maintains an individual case
• Compensation depends on individual damages
• Exposure history and medical evidence are evaluated separately

Many federal cases have been consolidated into multidistrict litigation (MDL), which streamlines pretrial proceedings while preserving individual claims.

Compensation Available in Roundup Cases

Potential compensation may vary depending on factors such as:

• Severity of illness
• Extent of exposure
• Medical expenses
• Lost income
• Pain and suffering
• Prognosis
• Age of the claimant

Damages may include:

Medical Costs

Compensation may help cover:

• Chemotherapy
• Radiation therapy
• Hospital bills
• Prescription medications
• Ongoing medical treatment

Lost Wages

Cancer treatment may prevent individuals from working or reduce earning capacity.

Pain and Suffering

Damages may also compensate for physical pain, emotional distress, and reduced quality of life.

Wrongful Death Damages

Families who lost loved ones may pursue compensation for funeral costs, loss of companionship, and financial support.

Why Warning Labels Matter

A central issue in many Roundup lawsuits involves whether consumers received adequate warnings about potential health risks.

Plaintiffs argue that stronger warnings could have allowed users to:

• Take additional precautions
• Limit exposure
• Use protective equipment
• Choose alternative products

The Importance of Statutes of Limitation

Every state imposes deadlines for filing product liability lawsuits. These deadlines are known as statutes of limitation.

The filing period may depend on:

• Date of diagnosis
• Discovery of injury
• State law
• Type of claim

Missing legal deadlines can prevent recovery, which is why many individuals seek legal advice promptly after diagnosis.

What to Expect During a Legal Consultation

Individuals seeking compensation begin with a case evaluation with one of our intake specialists.

During the consultation, our intake specialist may ask about:

• Duration of Roundup use
• Type of diagnosis
• Employment history
• Medical treatment
• Exposure frequency

Many of the law firms we work with handling Roundup cases work on a contingency fee basis, meaning clients generally do not pay attorney fees unless compensation is recovered.

Conclusion

The Roundup lawsuit represents one of the most significant toxic exposure litigations in recent history. Thousands of individuals allege that prolonged exposure to Roundup contributed to the development of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, Leukemia and related cancers.

The litigation has raised important questions regarding consumer safety, corporate transparency, and the responsibilities manufacturers owe to the public.

If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphoma or Leukemia after long-term Roundup exposure, you may be entitled to receive significant compensation. Understanding your rights and seeking timely legal guidance can help determine whether compensation may be available.